What Climate Weapons Are Capable Of

Table of contents:

Video: What Climate Weapons Are Capable Of

Video: What Climate Weapons Are Capable Of
Video: BEHIND THE GATES OF HAARP ~ What are they hiding? ~ CONSPIRACY EXPOSED 2024, March
What Climate Weapons Are Capable Of
What Climate Weapons Are Capable Of
Anonim

In the news, we constantly see reports of powerful hurricanes, disastrous floods, large-scale droughts and other destructive natural phenomena. And more and more often, mainly within the framework of various conspiracy theories, there are remarks that these natural disasters are the result of the use of a new type of weapon - climatic.

Image
Image

Climatic, or as it is also called geophysical, weapon is understood as the technology of influencing one or another natural phenomenon. At the present stage, these are mainly ways to control the movement of air masses, the amount of precipitation, fluctuations in the earth's crust and other environmental factors. The question is what technologies of geophysical weapons actually exist and how they can be used to achieve certain military-political goals.

Water and wind

Tropical storms have become a real disaster for the United States. And since in this country there is a steady tendency of relocation of people to the coast, the damage from hurricanes is growing every year. The record holder was hurricane Katrina in 2005, which cost the US treasury $ 41 billion, which, for example, would be a catastrophic financial loss for any country in South America, significantly reducing its economic and military potential.

The US government, realizing the seriousness of the problem, initiated the start of work on hurricane management a long time ago - from the 1960s - and initially they were aimed exclusively at a peaceful channel: to protect the coast from the elements.

In 1962, American scientists began the Stormfury project. Within the framework of this project, for the first time in the world, large-scale experiments were carried out on seeding clouds with silver iodide, which was supposed to turn a growing hurricane into a harmless rain.

The experiments went with varying success: scientists stated that the wind force is reduced by 10-30%, at the same time there are a large number of cases when the seeding of clouds did not have any effect on the hurricane. We can say that, in general, the hurricane stopping project failed, although it worked until 1983. But one thing the researchers were able to achieve: they found a reliable way to make it rain. And the results of their work were immediately used by the creative American military who fought the hard war in Vietnam.

From 1967 to 1972, the US Army conducted Operation Popeye to seeding clouds with silver iodide. The purpose of this military operation was to impede the actions of the rebels and the elimination of the Ho Chi Minh trail - it was simply to be washed away with water. The first test of silver iodide in the area of the Boloven Plateau in the Si Kong Valley was a success: the processed cloud crossed the border of Vietnam, and 23 cm of precipitation fell on the camp of the American special forces in four hours. Operation Popeye increased the spray season from 30 to 45 days and increased daily rainfall by a third. Aerial reconnaissance testified to the difficult movement on the roads, the soldiers noted that the soil had turned into a continuous sea of mud.

It should be noted that to achieve such results, only three C-130 transport aircraft and 2 F-4C cover fighters were required. In addition, despite the categorical denials of the Pentagon, many experts believe that the Popeye project was the cause of the disastrous flooding in North Vietnam that occurred in 1971 and covered more than 10% of the country.

It should be noted that political complications did not stop the American military. On possible international condemnation of climate manipulation, Defense Secretary Robert S. McNamara replied that such statements in the past were used to prevent military activities in the interests of US national security, that is, these are only the words of ill-wishers who want to prevent Americans from protecting their interests. Note that the government of Laos (silver iodide was sprayed over this country) was not even notified about the experiments with the climate. With the departure of the Americans from Vietnam, experiments on tropical typhoons did not stop: in the 1980s, Soviet aircraft were already engaged in this.

Currently, modern, more advanced reagents capable of provoking precipitation have been created and are used. For example, Dyn-O-Gel powder from Dyn-O-Mat is capable of absorbing a huge amount of moisture (2 thousand times its weight), turning into a sticky gel. Unfortunately, the powder failed experiments to prevent hurricanes: the rainfall in the nascent tornado caused the wind speed to fluctuate by a few meters per second. But Dyn-O-Gel is capable of causing heavy rainfall, flooding some areas and causing severe drought in others. True, this requires a lot of powder: if you want to shed 2 cm of rain on an area of 1 sq. km (20 thousand tons of water), you need to apply 10 tons of powder. That is, almost 38 thousand tons of powder will be needed to eliminate a hurricane 20 × 20 km. This is a huge figure: heavy C-5A transport aircraft with a carrying capacity of 100 tons will have to make 377 flights in a short time, which is almost impossible even with the American fleet and budget.

However, it should be stated that the creation of a local drought or prolonged rains is possible, moreover, it can be done secretly or from the territory of a neighboring state. Thus, heavy economic damage is inflicted on the enemy or it becomes impossible to conduct agriculture in the border regions. The problem is further complicated by the fact that absolutely all countries are vulnerable to manipulation with precipitation, especially such as China, where the vast majority of food is grown in several relatively small provinces.

And although the reality of "sabotage" spraying of substances like silver iodide, Dyn-O-Gel or almost invisible nanodispersed powders remains in question, there are no significant obstacles, except for the presence of political will for this. In theory, any aircraft flying over the territory of a sovereign state is capable of influencing the climate (spraying equipment is imperceptible, transit non-stop flights are not checked) and it is extremely difficult to detect the fact of spraying.

Currently, there is no reliable information about the use of this type of climatic weapon, except for Operation Popeye, declassified by an idle American journalist. Nevertheless, scandals over the possible use of precipitation-provoking reagents periodically occur: thousands of farmers from arid regions around the world peer up into the sky and periodically see suspicious trails trailing behind planes.

Damage to the economy and the enemy's armed forces can be caused not only by precipitation, but also by powerful hurricane winds. Strong winds destroy infrastructure, make it impossible to use army aviation, make it difficult to use tactical missiles and hamper ground forces. But can a hurricane be the first stage, for example, an invasion of the coast of a hostile state?

American scientist Moshe Alamaro of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology claims that there are hurricane management technologies. The essence lies in the artificial regulation of temperature in different parts of the incipient tornado. Motion control is carried out by targeted heating or cooling of specific areas by sowing soot, evaporating water, irradiation with microwaves, lasers, etc. According to the scientist, an excellent way of influencing the wind would be a large sea vessel equipped with two dozen jet engines that create a powerful ascending stream air. After just a few hours of operation, the engines begin to form a tornado, and it obediently follows the ship. In practice, it is not difficult to equip a ship with such a "tornado generator".

Tsunami bomb

The recent events in Japan and the powerful tsunami in Indonesia in 2004 make one wonder: can such catastrophic phenomena be caused artificially? 10 years ago, the secret American project Project Seal (1944-1945) became public. This military program, under the scientific supervision of Professor Thomas Leech, involved the detonation of large quantities of explosives on the seabed, which should have caused a local tsunami, washing away buildings on the enemy's coast.

Low power tests were carried out in the Pacific Ocean, near the Wangaparaoa Peninsula (New Zealand). The participants in the experiment considered them successful, but it is still unknown how this project actually ended. Later, there were also numerous sea trials of powerful atomic bombs, which are more suitable for creating giant waves. There is information that Thomas Leach himself was planned to be sent to the site of nuclear tests on Bikini Atoll, in order to collect information useful for the tsunami bomb project. As far as is known, he did not participate in these tests.

But back to today's events and ask ourselves the question, is it possible to link the recent devastating tsunamis with the use of atomic tsunami bombs? In fact, it turns out that it is extremely difficult to prove the fact of an underwater nuclear explosion, which also occurs against the background of a strong earthquake, and the accusation of killing tens of thousands of people requires serious evidence.

It should also be said that there are not so many developed countries vulnerable to tsunami bombs, including Great Britain and Japan. But most of all, the United States is vulnerable.

Impact from the ionosphere

The ionosphere is the part of the upper layers of the Earth's atmosphere located at an altitude of 50 km. It contains a large number of ions and free electrons that protect us from cosmic radiation. The influence of the ionosphere on the Earth's climate is not fully understood, but it is assumed that it is significant.

The impact on the ionosphere in order to create destructive natural phenomena is the most controversial and most discussed part of the history of geophysical weapons.

The debate is aggravated by the fact that two instruments for influencing the ionosphere are widely known: the high-frequency Russian SURA emitter and the similar but larger American HAARP complex.

Initially, both installations were built as experimental stands for studying the possibilities of influencing the ionosphere in order to disrupt radio communications, intercept ballistic missiles and other aircraft. Installations of the HAARP and SURA types using high-frequency radiation can heat a certain part of the ionosphere and create a plasmoid - a plasma clot consisting of magnetic fields and plasma.

Plasmoid has a lot of energy, it is potentially capable of destroying electronics, as well as reflecting radio waves. Thus, using installations of the HAARP type, it is possible to create a giant radio lens that reflects a radio beam in a chosen direction or, conversely, absorbs it.

In fact, the installation allows you to project electromagnetic radiation anywhere in the world. The radiation power remains a mystery. It is believed that the HAARP installation in Alaska is capable of producing up to 3.6 MW, and SURA - 750 kW. However, it is believed that the United States has erected similar installations in other regions: Australia, Greenland, Norway and Asia.

There are many rumors and myths surrounding HAARP. Fans of conspiracy theories believe that the installation is capable of causing earthquakes, emitting some "resonant" waves that provoke movements of the earth's crust. It is believed that HAARP radiation can even cause panic and insanity in thousands of people. Numerous earthquakes in different parts of the Earth, popular riots and military coups are cited as "examples". Books have been written about how the USA and the USSR (and later Russia) exchanged "geophysical strikes" and this climate war continues to this day. But all this "evidence", supported by photographs of unusual clouds, large hailstones, strange lightning and colored rain, is usually attributed to ordinary atmospheric phenomena or the result of industrial activity.

Recommended: